Another vivid example of “in the worst case, what (tf) would happen if xxx information is leaked?” ICLR is one of the most important computer science conferences. They do double-blind peer review on OpenReview. OpenReview makes all paper submissions and reviews public (e.g. anyone can view and make public comment on it, like Twitter). Reviewers goes under anonymous encrypted alias. Around Nov 11, a bug was found in OpenReview that you can query the anonymous encrypted alias of reviewers and get the true reviewer identity. Consider the openness of OpenReview, technically, everything was under the daylight from Nov 11 to Nov 27 (when at Thankgiving morning, the officials learnt and fixed the bug). ...

There’s a weird little hierarchy in classical music where “pleasant” is treated like a dirty word. The sweeter and more singable the piece, the faster some people rush to dismiss it as shallow. Waltz of the Flowers gets this treatment all the time: overplayed, overrated, “too syrupy.” The audacity! Tchaikovsky crafted every bar with care, every note is perfection. The orchestration is rich and luminous, structure is classic, and the melody is unforgettable without ever feeling cheap. ...

Perhaps the most unserious divertissement among the collection: “The last dance of Clara’s banquet tells the story of Mother Gigogne and her children, who appear from beneath her vast hoop skirt. The music is vibrant and at moments clownish in this fairytale number.” (Warner Classics)

Technically, the 2nd act of Nutcracker takes place in the candy kingdom. Marzipan is a kind of dessert. However, the original French name for the dance, Mirlitons, is an older term for a simple reed or pipe flute, similar to a kazoo. Huh. Puns. As I said, timeless. The high-pitched trill of the orchestral flutes float up to the stage and seemingly fuel our steps, which are as colorful, bright & perky as our costumes. Tutus & Tea ...

Tchaikovsky’s music is so iconic that the dance ‘Trepak’ is always associated with the piece. Cause technically, Trepak is a fast, energetic folk dance that originated in Ukraine and Southern Russia, known for its male dancers performing athletic moves like leg-flinging. It is widely recognized as the “Russian Dance” from Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s ballet The Nutcracker. The name comes from the Ukrainian word for the dance, tropak. Good old memory from Tugan Sokhiev with Munich Philharmonic in Shanghai 2024: the momentum, the rhythm, the chill of sitting at the choral seat for an encore of full spirit! ...

The 3rd of Nutcracker’s Divertissement is the Chinese Tea. I like this piece because its iconic, fancy flute&piccolo soli: This piece is also particularly controversial because, during the time Nutcracker is created, China is in Qing Dynasty so our image then wasn’t the most flattering of all (Eg. the male character in Balanchine’s version is quite offensive) ...

The 2nd divertissement following the first Spanish Dance is more of an Adagio, fancy Arabian Coffee dance. It’s not the easiest thing to choreograph—there are versions in which the girls look like they’re from Rite of Spring… (Just say, hypothetically, in the worst case, you need a bathroom break during Nutcracker…) But it’s undoubtedly beautiful, if executed well: ...

A Divertissement (French for “entertainment” or “amusement”) in ballet means one/several short dance performed as an interlude, often irrelevant to main plot but to showcase the dancers’ technical abilities. The Nutcracker has technically 7 divertissements: Mhmm, technically the Waltz of Flowers is also an interlude dance The naming of Tchaikovsky’s Dibertissements would sometimes be criticized to be racist. (Well, technically it’s more of a choreography problem, where the costumes and dances included a lot of racial stereotypes). Surely the whole history of Nutcracker wasn’t 100% polite or unbiased. But how the music themselves are named (e.g. Chinese Tea, Arabian Coffee) are “curious and fascinating”. In my pov, nothing wrong with Tchaikovsky or the traditional name, and we should keep the tradition. It’s more about the way artist/us interpret it, and it’s indeed better that we’re doing it with more care nowadays. ...

Yesterday’s pre–intermission piece was Haydn’s Symphony No. 93, which reminded me of something funny: Beethoven wrote 9 symphonies, Mozart around 50, Tchaikovsky 6… and Haydn wrote 104. Composers by number of symphonies by inclassicalmusic Haydn’s “London Symphonies” (Nos. 93–104) were written for his two London trips in the 1790s. The London audience loved Haydn, his music during that time was all charmingly lovely. No. 93 is especially fun — elegant, bright, and just cheeky enough. My friend was like, “I can totally picture people in wigs dancing minuets.” ...

Tonight Honeck conducted the CSO in Mozart’s Requiem: CSO and the Chicago Symphony Chorus Honeck’s arrangement wove together Mozart’s Requiem (K.626) with several of his earlier funeral works, linked by backstage Gregorian chants: Special Mozart Requiem program from CSO’s official program book. It clarifies the interesting history untangle the complicated authorship of Requiem. CSO’s really got amazing people writing program notes. ...